The first change is that in the OLD, this ceremony is referred to as the “Consecration of a Bishop” and in the NEW as the “Ordination of a Bishop”.



  1. Points to look for: The head is bound and anointed with sacred oil (Chrism) in the sign of a cross 3 times.
  2. The hands is anointed with sacred oil (Chrism) and bound.
  3. Episcopal gloves are placed upon the bishops hands. (Episcopal gloves are symbolical of purity from sin, the performance of good works, and carefulness of procedure).
  4. Holy water is used on the mitre, crosier and episcopal ring. 
  5. Offertory, new bishop presents bread, wine & candles. etc


First change is the ceremony  referred to as “ORDINATION of a Bishop” also

  1. Points to look for: The head is anointed with sacred oil (Chrism) but not in the sign of a cross 3 times. it is placed on the head as if it was brylcream or hair gel!
  2. The hands is not anointed with sacred oil (Chrism) and or bound.
  3. Episcopal gloves are not placed upon the bishops hands. 
  4. Holy water is not used on the mitre, crosier and episcopal ring. 
  5. The new bishop does not present, bread, wine and candles to the bishop etc.

Difference between Consecration and Ordination of a Bishop.


Comparison-of-Old-and-New-Consecration-Rites-2 (pdf)



We are now in the many decades of the post-Vatican II revolution. Serious Catholics have had to study their faith most diligently in order to keep it. The study of the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass has played a crucial role in safeguarding the traditional faith.

Likewise, it is extremely important that Catholics study the sacraments in detail, in order to see how the new rites of the sacraments are “cut out of the same cloth” as the novus ordo missae.

Since the sacrament of holy orders is the life source as it were for the sacramental life of grace, it certainly seems fitting to start with the study of this sacrament. 

Furthermore, with the issuance of Pope Benedict XVI’s motu proprio, Summorum Pontificum, it is all the more imperative to compare the old and new rites, to see what changes were made in the modern rite. 

Because the consecration of a bishop is the highest order of the priesthood, it seems logical to start one’s investigation there.

Understanding the Consecration Itself.

Before considering the form of the Consecration, it is important to consider the Catholic teaching about Sacraments. This explanation is taken from the Apostolic Constitution on Sacred Orders (Sacramentum Ordinis) by Pope Pius XII. “It is evident to all that the Sacraments of the New Law in so far as they are perceptible and efficient signs of invisible grace, should signify the grace they produce and produce the grace they signify. Indeed, the effects which must be produced and therefore signified by the sacred ordination of deaconate, priesthood, and episcopate (namely, power and grace) [sic] are found sufficiently signified in all rites of the universal Church, of different periods and places, by the imposition of hands and the words determining it.” [bold and underlined emphasis added; italics and parentheses in original]

Pope Pius XII declared ex cathedra in this document that “the matter of the Sacred Orders of deaconate, priesthood, and the episcopate is the imposition of hands. The form is the words determining the application of the matter, by which the sacramental effects are univocally signified --- namely the power of Orders and the grace of the Holy Spirit.” [italics are in the original but bold and underlined are added here for emphasis]

In other words the words of the form must specify what power of orders is given and that the grace of the Holy Ghost is given. Therefore in this ceremony the “grace and power of the episcopacy must be signified and conferred.” Catholic Encyclopedia,

Vol. IV, p. 278, Consecration, 1913 ed. Pope Pius XII states that for the episcopacy, the words of the Preface are the form and the essential words of this form for validity are: “Comple in Sacerdote tuo ministerii tui summam, et ornamentis totius glorificationis instructum coelestis unguente rore sanctifica.” This translated is: “Fill up (complete, perfect) in Thy Priest the perfection (sum total) of thy ministry and sanctify with the dew of

Thy heavenly ointment this Thy Servant (the Bishop-elect) decked out (adorned, embellished) with the ornaments of all beauty (glory).”

By saying essential words, Pope Pius XII is saying this is an example of the bare minimum needed for validity. Furthermore, Pope Pius XII states, “It shall be in no way right to understand from what we have declared and ordained above as

to matter and form, that it would be lawful to neglect in any way or to omit the other established rites of the Roman Pontifical.

Indeed, We ever command that all the prescribed details of that Roman Pontifical be religiously observed and carried out.”

With all of the above in mind, a better and more proper comparison can be made between the Old and New forms of Episcopal Consecration.


The modern rite of consecration and the new mass are fruits of the post-Vatican II revolution. Our Lord advised us to make judgments when he said, “By their fruits you shall know them. . . . Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit, and the evil tree bringeth forth evil fruit. A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can an evil tree bring forth good fruit.” (St. Matthew 7:16, 18). Indeed, the above comparisons are meant to inform Catholics about the exact changes made in this rite so they can make an educated judgment about the new rite. The reader, thus, can draw his own conclusions about the changes and this fruit of the revolution.


Canon Lawyer, Doctor of Thomistic Theology and former Secretary to Cardinal Alfons Stickler, Fr. Gregory Hesse discusses whether the changes to the sacraments made by Pope Paul VI are valid or not.